Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/4080/2018 of ABDUL MOIN SADIQUE ZAMAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS on 31 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010132872018 2026:GAU-AS:7553 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4080/2018 ABDUL MOIN SADIQUE ZAMAN S/O- ABDUL KHALEQUE, R/O- PASCHIM MUKUNDAATI, P.O AND P.S- JONIA, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782124 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM

GAHC010132872018

2026:GAU-AS:7553

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/4080/2018

ABDUL MOIN SADIQUE ZAMAN

S/O- ABDUL KHALEQUE, R/O- PASCHIM MUKUNDAATI, P.O AND P.S- JONIA, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782124

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

REP. BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, HEALTH

AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPTT, ASSAM SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

GOVT OF ASSAM

HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPTT

ASSAM SACHIBALAYA

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 781006

3:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY

GOVT OF ASSAM

HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPTT

ASSAM SACHIBALAYA

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 781006

4:THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION

SIX MILE

KHANAPARA

GUWAHATI- 781022

5:THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES

HENGRABARI HEALTH COMPLEX

HENGRABARI ROAD

LICHUBAGAN

GUWAHATI- 781036

6:THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES

HAILAKANDI

PIN- 788155

HAILAKANDI TOWN

HAILAKANDI DISTRICT

ASSAM

7:THE SUPERINTENDENT

S K ROY CIVIL HOSPITAL

HAILAKANDI

DIST- HAILAKANDI

PIN- 78815

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D DAS, MR. A H ALAMGIR

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HEALTH, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

01.06.2026 Heard Mr. A.H. Alamgir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. D. Borah, learned Standing Counsel for the Health Department.

2. The instructions issued on 01.06.2026 by the Joint Secretary to the Government of Assam, Health & Family Welfare Department, and placed before this Court through the learned Additional Advocate General, Assam, state that the representation submitted by the petitioner is under active consideration and that a final decision thereon shall be taken upon completion of the necessary examination of records and verification of all relevant facts. It has further been stated that an examination is also required to be conducted with regard to any outstanding Government dues or liabilities in any related matter, subject to fulfillment of the bond conditions. The instructions further request that 4 (four) weeks' time be granted to enable the Department to complete the aforesaid examination.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is a lack of clarity as to the authority competent to accept the petitioner's resignation, as well as the authority before whom the petitioner is required to deposit the bond amount so that the process of resignation may be initiated and completed.

4. The learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the present writ petition may be disposed of by directing the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam, Health & Family Welfare Department, to take a final decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner and thereafter communicate the same to the petitioner so as to enable him to take further necessary steps in accordance with law.

5. Accordingly, upon a consensus arrived at by the learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2, namely, the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam, Health & Family Welfare Department, to take appropriate steps for the expeditious disposal of the representations submitted by the petitioner, more particularly the representation dated 22.04.2018, and to pass a reasoned decision thereon within an outer limit of 6 (six) weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith.

6. The respondent No. 2 shall also inform the petitioner of the manner and mode in which, in the event of acceptance of his resignation, the bond amount is required to be paid, and shall further clarify the authority to whom such payment is to be made or remitted.

7. Needless to say, in the event the petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the respondent No. 2 on his representation, he shall be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law.

8. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead