Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3302/2025 of MINARAM BARUAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 31 May 2026
GAHC010126152025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3302/2025 MINARAM BARUAH SON OF THULESHWAR BARUAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BADALPATHAR, MILANPUR, P.O. ALENGI SATRA, DISTRICT- BISWANATH ASSAM, PIN- 784168. VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010126152025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3302/2025
MINARAM BARUAH
SON OF THULESHWAR BARUAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BADALPATHAR, MILANPUR, P.O. ALENGI SATRA, DISTRICT- BISWANATH ASSAM, PIN-
784168.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, REVENUE AND
DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
BISWANATH CHARIALI
DIST. BISWANATH
PIN- 784176.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
BISWANATH CHARIALI
DIST. BISWANATH
PIN- 784176.
4:ARUN BORA
S/O- LATE DIMBA BORA
VILL.- BORIGAON ALITOLA
MOUZA AND P.S. GOHPUR
PIN- 784168
DIST. BISWANATH
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K SINGH, MR. A DHANUKA,MR. A DUTTA,MR. A
GANGULY,M. BORUAH,MR B PUSHILAL
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR K KASHYAB,MR. K KALITA,MR. I H
SAIKIA,SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 01.06.2026 Heard Mr. S. K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. P. Mahanta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department, appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. P. K. Medhi, learned State Counsel, appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, and Mr. K. Kashyap, learned counsel appearing for the private respondent. Mr. S.K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel, submits that he has received instructions from the petitioner not to press the instant writ petition, as the petitioner intends to avail an alternative remedy available under law. The prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available in law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant