Gauhati High Court
Review.Pet./79/2026 of H. DEBASISH SINGHA AND 2 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS on 31 May 2026
GAHC010089152026 2026:GAU-AS:7566- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./79/2026 H. DEBASISH SINGHA AND 2 ORS S/O SAMARESH CHAKRABORTY, COLLEGE ROAD, SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN 788004 2: PAPIA DESHMUKHYA DAUGHTER OF
GAHC010089152026
2026:GAU-AS:7566-
DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Review.Pet./79/2026
H. DEBASISH SINGHA AND 2 ORS
S/O SAMARESH CHAKRABORTY, COLLEGE ROAD, SILCHAR, DIST.
CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN 788004
2: PAPIA DESHMUKHYA
DAUGHTER OF PRAVASH CHANDRA DESHMUKHYA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TARAPUR PART-VII
P.S. SILCHAR
SADAR SUB- DIVISION
SILCHAR
IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788003.
3: NIRUPAM SAHA
SON OF - SRI UTTAM KUMAR SAHA
RESIDENT OF P.W.D. QUARTER
SADAR GHAT
SILCHAR
P.S.- SILCHAR
P.O. SILCHAR
IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR
ASSAM
SILCHAR- 788001
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI
781006
2:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI- 781037
IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP (METRO)
ASSAM.
3:THE DIRECTOR
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEPARTMENT
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI- 781037
IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP(METRO)
ASSAM.
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
CACHAR DISTRICT
SILCHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788001.
5:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR
DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (DRDA)
CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788001.
6:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
SONAI DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788006.
7:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
SALCHAPRA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788814.
8:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
BARJALENGA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788117
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 01-06-2026 Heard Ms. S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. H. M. R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. The order dated 06.02.2026 passed in WP(C) No. 3047/2018 and WP(C) No. 1070/2018, which is sought to be reviewed in the present proceeding, is an order dismissing the said writ petitions for non- prosecution. This Court is of the considered view that, once a proceeding has been dismissed for non-prosecution, the appropriate remedy available to the aggrieved party is to seek restoration or recall of the order by filing an appropriate application. In view of the above, the present review petition being not maintainable, is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for restoration/recall of the order dated 06.02.2026, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant