Gauhati High Court
Review.Pet./35/2025 of SMT SABIJAN BIBI Vs JAMILA BIBI AND ORS on 31 May 2026
GAHC010014652025 2026:GAU-AS:7565 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./35/2025 SMT SABIJAN BIBI W/O LATE SATTAR ALI, RESIDENT OF SATBIL PART-2, TOKEYAMARI, P/O- BINNAKHATA, P/S-GOSSAIGAON, DIST- KOKRAJHAR,ASSAM, 783336
GAHC010014652025
2026:GAU-AS:7565
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Review.Pet./35/2025
SMT SABIJAN BIBI
W/O LATE SATTAR ALI, RESIDENT OF SATBIL PART-2, TOKEYAMARI, P/O- BINNAKHATA, P/S-GOSSAIGAON, DIST- KOKRAJHAR,ASSAM, 783336
VERSUS
JAMILA BIBI AND ORS
W/O- LATE SATTAR ALI, VILLAGE- SATBIL PT. II (TOKEYAMARI), P.O.- BINNYAKHATA, P.S.- GOSSAIGAON, DIST.- KOKRAJHAR, (BTR), ASSAM, (ASSAM) PIN- 783336.
2:THE COMMISSIONER
P AND R.D. DEPTT.
ASSAM
JURIPARA
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI- 37.
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCE DEPTT.
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
4:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
FINANCE DEPTT.
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
5:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ( A AND E)
ASSAM
MAIDAMGAON
BELTOLA
GUWAHATI-29.
6:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
783370.
7:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KOKRAJHAR
P.O. AND DIST.- KOKRAJHAR
BTC
ASSAM. 783370.
8:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) GOSSAIGAON CUM SECRETARY
MAHAKUMA PARISHAD
GOSSAIGAON
P.O. AND P.S.- GOSSAIGAON
DIST. KOKRAJHAR
BTC
ASSAM. 78333.
9:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM
P AND R D DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 0
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J I MONDAL, MR M A ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., MR. T ISLAM(R-1),MR. K ALOM(R-1),MD A
HUSSAIN (R-1),SC, BTC,SC, AG,SC, FINANCE,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 01-06-2026 None appears for the petitioner on call.
Heard Md. A. Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. Perused the grounds for review of the order dated 29.05.2024 passed in WP(C) No. 2741/2024. The review petitioner, claiming to be the legally married wife and successor of the deceased government servant, contends that she was not arrayed as a party respondent in WP(C) No. 2741/2024. Therefore, prays for review of the order dated 29.05.2024. By the order sought to be reviewed, this Court had disposed of the writ petition on the basis of the submission of the learned Standing Counsel, P&RD, that the competent authority to consider the claim for family pension and other retirement benefits of the deceased employee was the Principal Secretary, BTC, Kokrajhar and not the Commissioner, P&RD. Accordingly, liberty was granted to the writ petitioner to approach the Principal Secretary, BTC, Kokrajhar for consideration of her claim. It is noticed that after filing of the present review petition, the review petitioner remained unrepresented on several occasions when the matter was listed. Today also, none appears on behalf of the review petitioner. Having considered that no ground is made out for review of the order dated 29.05.2024 passed in WP(C) No. 2741/2024 and also considering that the review petitioner has remained unrepresented on three consecutive occasions when the matter was listed, the review petition stands dismissed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant