Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2480/2026 of MOYMUN NESSA Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS on 26 May 2026
GAHC010086802026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2480/2026 MOYMUN NESSA D/O- LATE HOBIB ALI AND SMTI. PROTINGA KHATUN @ PRATINGA KHATUN @ PRATINGA BIBI. R/O- VILL.- SINGARIA, P.S.- NILAMBAZAR, DIST.- SRIBHUMI,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010086802026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2480/2026
MOYMUN NESSA
D/O- LATE HOBIB ALI AND SMTI. PROTINGA KHATUN @ PRATINGA
KHATUN @ PRATINGA BIBI.
R/O- VILL.- SINGARIA, P.S.- NILAMBAZAR, DIST.- SRIBHUMI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA,MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS , SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-
110001.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT
OF ASSAM
HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
NIRVACHAN SADAN
ASHOK ROAD
NEW DELHI, PIN- 110001.
4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM ELECTION OFFICER
SRIBHUMI (FORMERLY KARIMGANJ) DIST.- SRIBHUMI
ASSAM, PIN- 788710.
5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER)
DIST.- SRIBHUMI
ASSAM, PIN - 788710
6:THE STATE CO- ORDINATOR OF NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS
Page No.# 2/2
(NRC)
ASSAM
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-05.
7:THE MEMBER
FOREIGNERS TRIBUNAL- III
SRIBHUMI (FORMERLY KARIMGANJ)
ASSAM
PIN- 78871
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N H BARBHUIYA, MS. S. DEY,MS. N.A. LASKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, ECI,SC, NRC,SC, F.T,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
27.05.2026 (S. K. Medhi, J)
Ms. S. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while presenting the writ petition, due to inadvertence, certain important documents were left out. She accordingly submits that the writ petition be dismissed on withdrawal with a liberty. Also heard Ms. A. Verma, learned Standing Counsel, Home Department & NRC, who does not seriously object to the aforesaid prayer. In view of the aforesaid submission, writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant