Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/245/2026 of SAJAL KAMAL DAS Vs NARAYAN KONWAR, IAS on 26 May 2026
GAHC010091092026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/245/2026 SAJAL KAMAL DAS SON OF LATE BHUBANESWAR DAS, RESIDENT OF FAIRY LAND COMPLEX, GALIAHATI NO. 2, P.O AND DISTRICT- BARPETA- 781301, ASSAM VERSUS NARAYAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010091092026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/245/2026 SAJAL KAMAL DAS SON OF LATE BHUBANESWAR DAS, RESIDENT OF FAIRY LAND COMPLEX, GALIAHATI NO. 2, P.O AND DISTRICT- BARPETA- 781301, ASSAM VERSUS NARAYAN KONWAR, IAS THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION (SECONDARY), DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 For the petitioner : Mr. Sajal Kamal Das, Petitioner-in-person For the respondent : Ms. R. Barua, Advocate
Page No.# 2/2
– B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 27-05-2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, C.J.) Pursuant to the judgment dated 06.04.2026 passed by this Court in WA 402/2025, the marks allotted to the appellant/petitioner and respondent No.6 have been revisited and now an order has been passed on 26.05.2026 as directed by this Court. A copy of the afore-noted order has been served upon the petitioner and has also been filed across the Board. The same is taken on record. With the passing of the afore-noted order, there would be no necessity of continuing with this contempt petition. Accordingly, this contempt petition stands consigned. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent, he may, if so deemed necessary, challenge the same in an appropriate proceeding.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant