Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/1489/2026 of THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A AND E Vs SAHERA KHATUN on 24 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010029402026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1489/2026 THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A AND E ASSAM, MAIDAMGAON, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI-781 029. RESPONDENTS NO.5 IN WPC NO 2838/2024 VERSUS SAHERA KHATUN W/O- LATE

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010029402026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1489/2026

THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A AND E

ASSAM, MAIDAMGAON, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI-781 029. RESPONDENTS

NO.5 IN WPC NO 2838/2024

VERSUS

SAHERA KHATUN

W/O- LATE SHAHAJAHAN ALI, VILL. - GUTIPARA PT-VI, P.O. GUTIPARA, P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783348.

2:THE STATE OF ASSAM

REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

DISPUR

GHY-6.

3:THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT

ASSAM UZANBAZAR GHY-1

4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

DHUBRI ASSAM P.O. P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI PIN- 783301

5:THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER

DHUBRI P.O. P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM

6:THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER

ICDS PROJECT NAYERALGA BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM.

7:TREASURY OFFICER BILASIPARA TREASURY OFFICE

BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783 348. ..RESPONDENTS NO. 1

2 3

4

Page No.# 2/2

6 AND 7 IN WPC NO.2838/202

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R K TALUKDAR, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE,MR. M U MONDAL

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 25.05.2026

1. The present application has been filed by the petitioner, praying for deletion of the name of the respondent No.5 i.e., the Accountant General (A and E), Assam Maidam Gaon, Beltola, from the array of parties in this writ petition.

2. The learned Government counsel appearing for the respondents do not object to the same.

3. Accordingly, the I.A. is allowed. The respondent No.5 is struck off from the array of parties in the present writ petition.

3. I.A. is allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead