Gauhati High Court
Review.Pet./84/2026 of BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL Vs DIPAK PATHAK on 24 May 2026
GAHC010062272026 2026:GAU-AS:7256 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./84/2026 BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR, P/O. KOKRAJHAR, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM, PIN-783370 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BODOLAND TERRITORAL
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010062272026
2026:GAU-AS:7256
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Review.Pet./84/2026
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
KOKRAJHAR, P/O. KOKRAJHAR, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM, PIN-783370
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BODOLAND TERRITORAL COUNCIL
2: DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCI
VERSUS
DIPAK PATHAK
S/O. LT. PARBIN PATHAK, VILL.- BHAKATPARA, P/O. CHECHAPANI, DIST.
BAKSA, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. N CHOUDHURY, N.R. SHARMA,MR A SHARMA,MR. A
KHOUND,MS. B BHUYAN,MR. A K BHUYAN
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
25.05.2026 Heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. R. Das, learned counsel appearing for the applicants in Review Petition No.84/2026. Also heard Mr. B.K. Das, learned counsel for the opposite party.
Page No.# 2/2 By this application, the petitioners have prayed that the condition imposed upon them to pay costs of Rs. 15,000/- in the event the counter affidavit is not brought on record by 25.02.2026 in WP(C) Nos. 3106/2023 and 4868/2023 be modified/altered or condoned. The learned Senior Counsel submitted that the affidavit had already been presented for filing on 25.02.2026, but could not be brought on record due to certain procedural requirements in the Registry remaining to be complied with. Accordingly, this Court is of the opinion that since steps had already been taken by the applicants to have the affidavit brought on record on or before 25.02.2026, therefore the condition imposing costs of Rs. 15,000/- upon the applicants is required to be recalled. Accordingly, the same is recalled. This Review Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant