Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1651/2026 of SRI JAHIRUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. on 21 May 2026
GAHC010095872026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1651/2026 SRI JAHIRUL ISLAM SON OF LATE NAIMUL ISLAM, R/O SILPUKHURI, P/O SILPUKHURI, P/S. MIKIRBHETA, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3
GAHC010095872026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1651/2026
SRI JAHIRUL ISLAM
SON OF LATE NAIMUL ISLAM, R/O SILPUKHURI, P/O SILPUKHURI, P/S.
MIKIRBHETA, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY , GOVT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06
2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
3:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE
FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT
REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN
THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
4:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE
FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT
REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN
THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
MORIGAON
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA, B SHARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
22-05-2026 (Arun Dev Choudhury, J)
1. We have heard Mr. P.J.Saikia, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, P&RD Department and Mr. S. Baruah, learned counsel, for the respondents/opposite parties.
2. The present Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of the delay of 360 days in preferring the connected Writ Appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 21.02.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 941/2025.
3. Perused the averments made in the application.
4. After going through the averments made in the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicant/appellant for condoning the delay of 360 days in preferring the connected appeal.
5. We, therefore, condone the delay.
6. The Interlocutory Application stands disposed off.
7. Registry to process the appeal and, if the same is found defect free, list it on 27.07.2026 under the appropriate heading.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Comparing Assistant