Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2481/2026 of DR HIMANGSHU BARMAN Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS on 20 May 2026
GAHC010089772026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2481/2026 DR HIMANGSHU BARMAN SON OF LATE DINANATH BARMAN, WORKING AS SCIENCIST-C, REGIONAL SERICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION (RSRS), CENTRAL SILK BOARD, BOKO, KAMRUP
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010089772026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2481/2026
DR HIMANGSHU BARMAN
SON OF LATE DINANATH BARMAN,
WORKING AS SCIENCIST-C, REGIONAL SERICULTURAL RESEARCH
STATION (RSRS), CENTRAL SILK BOARD,
BOKO, KAMRUP ASSAM PIN- 781123
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF TEXTILES, UDYOG BHAWAN, NEW DELHI - 110011 2:MEMBER SECRETARY CENTRAL SILK BOARD MINISTRY OF TEXTILE GOVT. OF INDIA BTM LAYOUT MADIVALA BANGLORE- 560068 3:DIRECTOR CENTRAL MUGA ERI RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE (CMERTI) LAHDOIGARH JORHAT - 785700 4:HEAD, REGIONAL SERICULTURE RESEARCH STATION (RSRS) CENTRAL SILK BOARD BOKO KAMRUP-78112 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. Kaushik, Advocate. : Mr. S. Hazarika, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, Senior Advocate/Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Ms. L. Devi, Advocate.
Page No.# 2/2 –B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
21.05.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ)
After some arguments, Mr. B. Kaushik, learned Advocate for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition in order to enable the petitioner to make a representation before the employer/respondents to consider his case for transfer to his home district in the last leg of his service as he is due to retire shortly. Permission is granted. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty, as aforesaid, with the hope and expectation that any representation filed by the petitioner shall be considered by the authorities and he would be communicated the decision forthwith.
JUDGE CHIEF
JUSTICE
Comparing Assistant