Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/7295/2025 of JOYRAM YADAV Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS on 20 May 2026
GAHC010022432026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/939/2026 BRAJESH KUMAR SIKWAR S/O BIRENDRA NARAYAN SINGH, PERMANENT ADDRESS HOUSE NO 537, SIGMA 4, SAHARA CIT YROAD, NO 15, JAMSHEDPUR, P.S. MANGO, DIST. EAST
GAHC010022432026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/939/2026
BRAJESH KUMAR SIKWAR
S/O BIRENDRA NARAYAN SINGH, PERMANENT ADDRESS HOUSE NO 537, SIGMA 4, SAHARA CIT YROAD, NO 15, JAMSHEDPUR, P.S. MANGO, DIST.
EAST SINGHBHUM, PRESENT ADDRESS C/O SHRI RAVI KANT, RAILWA
QTR, 12E MODEL COLON, PANDU, PIN 781012
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THEBRSECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HORNE
AFFAIRS,BRGOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NE DELHIBR-
110001.
2:DIRECTOR GENERAL
SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL (SSB)
EAST BLOCK V
R.K. PURAM
NEW DELHI 110066
3:INSPECTOR GENERAL
FRONTIER HEADQUARTERS
SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL
GUWAHATI
ASSAM 781001
4:DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL (PERSONNEL)
SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL
EAST BLOCK V
R.K. PURAM
NEW DELHI 11006
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N N JHA, DIKSHITA DAS,MS M SAHOO,MR M U
KHAN,MR. M BERIA
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. K GOGOI(C.G.C.)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
21.05.2026 Heard Mr. Beria, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. NN. Sarma, appearing on behalf of Mr. K. Gogoi, learned counsel CGC, who prays for an accommodation to file their affidavit-in-opposition, since the instructions have been received. Affording such an opportunity, list this matter on 18.06.2026 . The petitioner has renewed his prayer for suspension of the order dated 16.12.2026. The learned counsel has submitted that since the order of conviction has been stayed by the Appellate Court, the interim prayer of the petitioner may be considered at this stage. The matter is one of dismissal from service vide Order dated 16.12.2025, on the basis of the conviction of the petitioner. Since the respondents have been served with the copy of the order by which the conviction has been kept in abeyance, it would be open for the respondents to reconsider the dismissal of the petitioner, since on the basis of merits of the appeal, the conviction has been kept in abeyance by the Appellate Court. The decision of the respondent authorities with regard to the reconsideration of the dismissal order, if any, shall be placed before this Court on the next date of hearing. The petitioner is allowed to renew his prayer on the next date of listing. The respondent shall ensure filing the affidavit-in-opposition before the next date of listing. JUDGE Comparing Assistant