Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/506/2026 of SRI GANESH SARKAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 19 May 2026
GAHC010089562026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/506/2026 SRI GANESH SARKAR SON OF -GOBARDHAN SARKAR, VILL-SARUCHARI TEA ESTATE, POST OFFICE - SOCKALATING, POLICE STATION - PULIBOR, DISTRICT - JORHAT, ASSAM,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010089562026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/506/2026
SRI GANESH SARKAR
SON OF -GOBARDHAN SARKAR, VILL-SARUCHARI TEA ESTATE, POST
OFFICE - SOCKALATING, POLICE STATION - PULIBOR, DISTRICT - JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785703
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. S KHATANIAR, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0
SRI GANESH SARKAR
SON OF -GOBARDHAN SARKAR VILL-SARUCHARI TEA ESTATE POST
OFFICE - SOCKALATING POLICE STATION - PULIBOR DISTRICT - JORHATASSAM PIN- 785703
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MRS SANGEETA KHATANIAR
Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20.05.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mrs. S. Khataniar, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 994 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant-appellant under Section 376(1) IPC.
2. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned.
3. Accordingly, the delay of 994 days is condoned.
4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same.
5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant