Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/150/2021 of ISMAIL HUSSAIN Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS on 19 May 2026
GAHC010194052020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/150/2021 ISMAIL HUSSAIN S/O- LT. ASARUDDIN, R/O- VILL- NO. 1 BATALIMARI, P.O. AND P.S. LAHAORIGHAT, DIST.- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782127 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010194052020
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/150/2021
ISMAIL HUSSAIN
S/O- LT. ASARUDDIN, R/O- VILL- NO. 1 BATALIMARI, P.O. AND P.S.
LAHAORIGHAT, DIST.- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782127
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME
AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI- 110001
2:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
REP. BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA
NIRVACHAN BHAWAN
ASHOKA ROAD
NEW DELHI- 110001
3:THE CO-ORDINATOR
NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS
ASSAM, KAMRUP (M), GHY, ASSAM
4:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
HOME DEPTT.
DISPUR GHY-06
5:THE DY. COMMISSIONER
MARIGAON
DIST.- MARIGAON, ASSAM
6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B)
MARIGAON
DIST.- MARIGAON, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M CHETIA, Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., SC, F.T,SC, NRC,SC, ELECTION COMMISSION.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20-05-2026 (S.K Medhi, J)
None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call, whereas, Shri. P. Sarma, learned Government Advocate for the respondent No. 5; Ms. A. Verma, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 3, 4 & 6 and Ms. N. Katakey, learned Standing Counsel, ECI for the respondent no. 2 are present.
2. On the last occasion i.e. on 24.04.2026, none had appeared for the petitioner and in fact, this Court had made certain observations which are extracted here under; “For ends of justice, matter is adjourned for today. However, it is made clear that if on the next date, the petitioner is not represented, necessary orders shall be passed. List again on 20.05.2026.”
3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this case.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
5. Records be sent back. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant