Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/904/2026 of SHRI MOHAN KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 19 May 2026
GAHC010052102026 2026:GAU-AS:6946- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/904/2026 SHRI MOHAN KUMAR S/O LATE SURESH KUMAR, RO VIL. BARJALAH, P.O. AND P.S. TANGLA, DIST. UDALGURI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
GAHC010052102026
2026:GAU-AS:6946-
DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/904/2026
SHRI MOHAN KUMAR
S/O LATE SURESH KUMAR, RO VIL. BARJALAH, P.O. AND P.S. TANGLA, DIST. UDALGURI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF
ASSAM, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 06.
2:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT
SLC REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 06.
3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER OF IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT
ASSAM
GUWAHATI 781003. CHANDMARI
4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DARRANG
DISTRICT
MANGALDOI
PIN 784125.
5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
MANGALDOI DIVISION IRRIGATION
MANGADOI
PIN 784125
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHETRI, J SARMAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, IRRIGATION
BEFORE
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
20-05-2026 (AD Choudhury, J)
1. Heard Mr. B Chetri, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mrs. S Sarma, learned Junior Government Advocate representing the respondent Nos. 2 and 4.
2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed for condonation of the delay of 21 days in filing the connected appeal against the judgment dated 06.01.2026 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No. 2294/2024.
3. Perused the averments made in the application.
4. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have no instruction to object the present application.
5. After going through the averments made at paragraph No. 8 of the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicant/appellant for condoning the delay of 21 days in preferring the appeal.
6. We, therefore, condone the delay.
7. The interlocutory Application stands disposed off.
8. Registry to process the connected appeal and, if the same is found defect-free, shall list the same under appropriate heading, preferably on 10.08.2026.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant