Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1293/2026 of MD MUKTADUR ALI ALIAS MD MOKDADUR ROHMAN Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS on 18 May 2026
GAHC010079682026 2026:GAU-AS:6905- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1293/2026 MD MUKTADUR ALI ALIAS MD MOKDADUR ROHMAN S/O LATE NURUL ISLAM ALIAS NUR ISLAM, R/O VILLAGE- KHOPATI PART- II, (CHOTOBOZRA), P.O- HAZIRHAT,
GAHC010079682026
2026:GAU-AS:6905-
DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1293/2026
MD MUKTADUR ALI ALIAS MD MOKDADUR ROHMAN
S/O LATE NURUL ISLAM ALIAS NUR ISLAM, R/O VILLAGE- KHOPATI PART- II, (CHOTOBOZRA), P.O- HAZIRHAT, P.S- SUKCHAR, DISTRICT- SOUTH
SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAMASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT.
OF INDIA, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI- 110001
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
RERESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
HOME DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006
3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION
NIRVACHAN SADAN
ASHOKA ROAD
4:THE STATE COORDINATOR
NATIONAL REGISTRATION OF CITIZENS
ASSAM
1ST FLOOR
ACHYUT PLAZA
G.S ROAD
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI
Page No.# 2/6
ASSAM
PIN- 785001
5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
SIVASAGAR
P.O- SIVASAGAR
DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
PIN- 785640
6:THE DEPUTY COMMSSIONER
SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
P.O- HATSINGIMARI
DIST.- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783135
7:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER)
P.O.- SIVASAGAR
DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
PIN- 785640
8:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER)
SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
P.O.- HATSINGIMARI
DISTRICT- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783135
9:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF SUKCHAR POLICE STATION
DISTRICT- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 78313
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M AHMED, MR A HAI
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, F.T,SC, NRC,GA, ASSAM,SC, ECI
Linked Case : WP(C)/1623/2026
MD MUKTADUR ALI ALIAS MD MOKDADUR ROHMAN
S/O LATE NURUL ISLAM ALIAS NUR ISLAM
R/O VILLAGE- KHOPATI PART-II
(CHOTOBOZRA)
P.O- HAZIRHAT
P.S- SUKCHAR
DISTRICT- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
GOVT. OF INDIA
SHASTRI BHAWAN
NEW DELHI- 110001
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
RERESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
HOME DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006
3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION
NIRVACHAN SADAN
ASHOKA ROAD
4:THE STATE COORDINATOR
NATIONAL REGISTRATION OF CITIZENS
ASSAM
1ST FLOOR
ACHYUT PLAZA
G.S ROAD
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 785001
5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
SIVASAGAR
P.O- SIVASAGAR
DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
PIN- 785640
6:THE DISTRICT COMMSSIONER
Page No.# 4/6
SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
P.O- HATSINGIMARI
DIST.- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783135
7:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER)
P.O.- SIVASAGAR
DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
PIN- 785640
8:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER)
SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
P.O.- HATSINGIMARI
DISTRICT- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783135
9:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF SUKCHAR POLICE STATION
DISTRICT- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783135
------------
Advocate for : MR. M AHMED
Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS
-BEFORE-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19-05-2026 (S.K Medhi, J)
Heard Sri M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant/writ petitioner. Also heard Mr. G. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel appears for the Home Department and NRC. By the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for extension of time for appearing before the concerned authority as directed vide the order dated 18.03.2026 passed in the connected WP(C) 1623 of 2026. It is contended that vide the aforesaid order dated 18.03.2026, while notice was issued, the petitioner was granted bail, subject to his appearance before the Superintendent of Police, (Border), Jorhat within 10(ten) days. Subsequently, it came to the notice of the petitioner that the concerned authority would be to be the Superintendent of Police (Border), Golaghat and accordingly, I.A. No. 1079 of 2026 was filed, which was also allowed by this Court vide order dated 08.04.2026. Sri Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant/writ petitioner has submitted that in the meantime, the period of 10(ten) days has expired and therefore, he prays for extension of time. Sri G. Sharma, the learned counsel for the Home Department, has not seriously objected to the aforesaid prayer. He, however, has submitted that a final opportunity be granted for such appearance. In view of the above, after considering the facts and circumstances and hearing, the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that interest of justice would be served if an extended date is given to the applicant/writ petitioner to appear in terms of the order dated 18.03.2026. We, accordingly, direct the petitioner to appear before the Superintendent of Police Border, (Sivasagar) on or before 01.06.2026. The conditions imposed vide the order dated 18.03.2026 would be applicable provided the applicant/writ petitioner appears in terms of the today’s order. This interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant