Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5410/2020 of NAYAK INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. on 17 May 2026
GAHC010180502020 2026:GAU-AS:6821 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5410/2020 NAYAK INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SWARUPNANDA ROAD, LUMDING-
GAHC010180502020
2026:GAU-AS:6821
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5410/2020
NAYAK INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SWARUPNANDA ROAD, LUMDING- 782447, P.O.-LUMDING, DIST-NAGAON, ASSAM AND ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICE
AT 2ND FLOOR, KAMAKHYA COMMERCIAL, C.K. ROAD, PAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI-781001 AND IS REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
SHRI ANANTA CHARAN NAYAK, SWARUPA NANDA ROAD, LUMDING, DIST-NAGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAILWAY
BOARD, RAILWAY BHAWAN, NEW DELHI
2:THE GENERAL MANAGER/CONSTRUCTION
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL MANAGER/CON
NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
MALIGAON
GUWAHATI-1
3:THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER/CON-2/MLG
NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
MALIGAON
GUWAHATI-1
4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER/CON-9
NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
MALIGAON
GUWAHATI-1
5:THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER/CON-III/MLG
NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
SILCHAR
6:FA AND CAO/CON-I
NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
MALIGAON
GUWAHATI-
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G N SAHEWALLA, MR K DEKA,MR S DAS,MR H K
SARMA,MR. M SAHEWALLA,MR D SENAPATI,MD ASLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, RAILWAY, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.05.2026 None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call.
2. It is seen that on 24.04.2026 also, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
3. From the above, it therefore, appears that the petitioner must have lost interest in the instant proceeding.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
5. Mr. G. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel has appeared on behalf of the Railway Department.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant