Gauhati High Court
MC/18/2026 of BOKAJAN CEMENT CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 17 May 2026
GAHC010064772026 2026:GAU-AS:6818 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : MC/18/2026 BOKAJAN CEMENT CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION BOKAJAN P.O. BOKAJAN DISTRICT KARBI ANGLONG PIN 782490 BEING REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY SHRI PRATAP
GAHC010064772026
2026:GAU-AS:6818
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : MC/18/2026
BOKAJAN CEMENT CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION
BOKAJAN
P.O. BOKAJAN
DISTRICT KARBI ANGLONG
PIN 782490
BEING REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY
SHRI PRATAP BORAH
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
SON OF LATE PURNA CHANDRA BORA
RESIDENT OF BOARDING ROAD
WARD NO. 6
P.O. AND P.S. SIVASAGAR
785640
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF HEAVY INDUSTRIES
NEW DELHI 110001
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
JANATA BHAWAN
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
3:MANAGEMENT OF BOKAJAN CEMENT FACTORY A UNIT OF CEMENT
CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER
BOKAJAN DISTRICT KARBI ANGLONG
------------
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. S.R.A. Naser, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. J. Roy, Sr. Advocate Ms. U. Das, Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate Mr. S.S. Roy, CGC
Mr. B.P. Sarmah, Advocate
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 18.05.2026
This is an application for restoration of the accompanying writ petition being WP(C) No. 6958/2016, which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 22.10.2025.
2. This Court has perused the averments made in the instant application and has also heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
3. Taking into account the reasons assigned, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for recalling the order dated 22.10.2025 by which the accompanying writ petition being WP(C) No. 6958/2016 was dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Accordingly, the order dated 22.10.2025 stands recalled and the writ petition being WP(C) No. 6958/2016 is restored to the file of this Court.
5. With the above observations, the instant application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant