Gauhati High Court
WA/269/2024 of PROF. GURU PRASAD KHATANIAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS on 17 May 2026
GAHC010151192024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/269/2024 PROF. GURU PRASAD KHATANIAR S/O- LATE RAJANI KANTA KHATANIAR, R/O- KRISHNA NAGAR, NEAR HOLY CHILD SCHOOL, GHY- 781003 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REP.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010151192024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WA/269/2024
PROF. GURU PRASAD KHATANIAR
S/O- LATE RAJANI KANTA KHATANIAR, R/O- KRISHNA NAGAR, NEAR
HOLY CHILD SCHOOL, GHY- 781003
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (HIGHER) DEPTT, KAHILIPARA, GHY- 19
2:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GHY- 19
3:THE BHATTADEV UNIVERSITY
REP. BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR
BAJALI
PATHSALA
PIN- 781325
ASSAM
4:THE REGISTRAR (IN CHARGE)
BHATTADEV UNIVERSITY
BAJALI
PATHSALA
PIN- 781325
ASSAM
5:THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF BHATTADEV UNIVERSITY
REP. BY ITS EX OFFICIO MEMBERS
BAJALI
PATHSALA
PIN- 781325
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM
6:THE GAUHATI UNIVERSITY
REP. BY ITS VC
GHY- 14
7:THE REGISTRAR
GAUHATI UNIVERSITY
GHY- 14
8:PROF. BIRINCHI KUMAR DAS
VC
BHATTADEV UNIVERSITY
HOUSE NO. 3A
KAILASHPUR MAIN BYE LANE
LANKESWAR JALUKBARI
GUWAHATI 781014 ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K CHOUDHURY, MR. M SARMA,MR P BHARADWAJ
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, EDU, MR. TANUZ KASHYAP(R-8),MR. D J DAS(R-8),MR. R
M DEKA(R-8),SC, G U,MR. K N CHOUDHURY,FOR CAVEATOR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 18/05/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has become infructuous. Mr. N. Gautam, learned counsel appears for the respondent no. 8. In view of the submission made by Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the appellant, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant