Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2554/2026 of KAUSHIK GHOSH Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 17 May 2026
GAHC010089662026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2554/2026 KAUSHIK GHOSH S/O LATE RAJENDRA GHOSH ALIAS RAJENDRA KUMAR GHOSH RESIDENT OF H. NO. 161, VILL - KAHILIPARA, VINOBANAGAR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M) , ASSAM,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010089662026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2554/2026
KAUSHIK GHOSH
S/O LATE RAJENDRA GHOSH ALIAS RAJENDRA KUMAR GHOSH
RESIDENT OF H. NO. 161, VILL - KAHILIPARA, VINOBANAGAR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M) , ASSAM, PIN-781018
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW
DELHI-01.
3:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOME
GOVERMNT OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 6
4:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER
NIRVACHAN SADAN
ASHOKA ROAD
NEW DELHI - 110001.
5:THE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER
KAMRUP METRO DISTRICT
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
HENGRBARI
GUWAHATI
ASSAM781036
6:THE ELECTION REGISTRATION OFFICER
Page No.# 2/2
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM.
7:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (BORDER)
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
GUWAHATI-ASSAM-78102
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B P SARMAH, MR. R HAZARIKA,S DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, ECI,SC, F.T,SC, NRC,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.05.2026 (S.K. Medhi, J)]
Shri S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while presenting the petition, there have been some inadvertent mistake and therefore, he prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh. Also heard Ms. A. Verma, learned Standing Counsel, Home Deptt. & NRC who does not raise serious objection. In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant