Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/2174/2025 of DR PRITOM KUMAR BORTHAKUR AND ORS Vs SRI PREMJIT SARMA AND ORS on 14 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010116892019 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : W I.A.(Civil)/2174/2025 DR PRITOM KUMAR BORTHAKUR AND ORS S/O SRI PORESH CHANDRA BORTHAKUR RESIDENT OF 402 B ASTHA APARTMENT SURVEY BASISTHA ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP M ASSAM

GAHC010116892019

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : W I.A.(Civil)/2174/2025

DR PRITOM KUMAR BORTHAKUR AND ORS

S/O SRI PORESH CHANDRA BORTHAKUR

RESIDENT OF 402

B ASTHA APARTMENT

SURVEY

BASISTHA ROAD

GUWAHATI KAMRUP M ASSAM 781028

2: DR. MADHUMITA ADHIKARI

W/O DR. IRAN BHARALI

RESIDENT OF 402

B ASTHA APARTMENT

SURVEY

BASISTHA ROAD

GUWAHATI KAMRUP M ASSAM 781028

3: DR. PRANJIT KHANIKAR

S/O SRI SATYENDRA NATH KHANIKAR

RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 6

NABODAY PATH

HENGRABARI

GUWAHATI 781036 DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM

4: DR. BRAJENDRA LAHKAR

S/O LATE SURENDRA CHANDRA LAHKAR

RESIDENT OF 302

B ASTHA APARTMENT

SURVEY

BASISTHA ROAD

GUWAHATI KAMRUP M ASSAM 781028

5: DR. ARUP KUMAR NATH

S/O SRI BHADRESWAR NATH

RESIDENT OF 4-D

PAN RESIDENCY

NAMGHAR PATH

PANJABARI

GUWAHATI 781037 DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM

APPLICANT 1 TO 5 ARE REP. BY THEIR CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY DR.

PALASH JYOTI MAZUMDAR

6: DR. PALASH JYOTI MAZUMDAR

S/O SRI RATNESWAR MAZUMDAR

RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 17

GOVT. PRESS ROAD BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI 781021

DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM

VERSUS

SRI PREMJIT SARMA AND ORS

S/O LATE PRAFULLA CHANDRA SARMA

DIRECTOR

M/S MANISHA BUILD AND TRADE PVT. LTD.

RESIDENT OF 11

MUKUNDA PATH

RUKMINIGAON

GUWAHATI-22

P.O. AND P.S. DISPUR

KAMRUP(M)

ASSAM.

2:THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

GUWAHATI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6.

3:GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMDA)

REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN

GMDA

STATEFED BUILDING

BHANGAGARH

GUWAHATI-5.

4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

STATEFED BUILDING

BHANGAGARH

GUWAHATI-5.

5:JEUTI DAS

W/O SRI SATYAJIT BHUYAN

R/O FLAT NO. 201

MANISHA AVENUE

RUKMINIGAON

GUWAHATI-22

P.O. AND P.S. DISPUR

DIST. KAMRUP METRO

ASSAM

------------

Advocate for : S RABHA

Advocate for : SC

G M D A appearing for SRI PREMJIT SARMA AND ORS

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 15.05.2026 Heard Mr. A. K. Chaudhury, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also heard Mr. N. Das, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent No. 1; Mr. S. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 and Mr. G. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4. By way of this interlocutory application, the applicants i.e., Dr. Pritom Kumar Borthakur, Dr. Madhumita Adhikari, Dr. Pranjit Khanikar, Dr. Brajendra Lahkar, Dr. Arup Kumar Nath and Dr. Palash Jyoti Mazumdar, are seeking their impleadment as respondents in the connected writ petition being WP(C) No. 3455/2019. The applicants are the owners of the commercial space situated at the ground floor of the building, which the petitioner has developed by virtue of his agreement with the land owners. The issue involved in the connected writ petition is as regards the demolition of the building in question constructed by the promoter/petitioner on the ground of alleged deviation as raised by GMDA. In view of the aforesaid, though the presence of the applicants may not be necessary for maintaining the writ petition; however, their presence appears to be proper and essential for effective and full adjudication of the connected writ petition. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands allowed. Resultantly, the applicants, i.e., Dr. Pritom Kumar Borthakur, Dr. Madhumita Adhikari, Dr. Pranjit Khanikar, Dr. Brajendra Lahkar, Dr. Arup Kumar Nath and Dr. Palash Jyoti Mazumdar, be impleaded as respondent Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 respectively, in the connected writ petition. Let an amended cause title be submitted before the Registry for doing the needful. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead