Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/910/2026 of SHRI BIJIT KUMAR RAY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 14 May 2026
GAHC010046412026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/910/2026 SHRI BIJIT KUMAR RAY SON OF LATE SAILEN CHANDRA RAY,VILL- GAURIPUR, WARD NO. 1,P.O- GAURIPUR, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
GAHC010046412026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/910/2026
SHRI BIJIT KUMAR RAY
SON OF LATE SAILEN CHANDRA RAY,VILL- GAURIPUR, WARD NO. 1,P.O- GAURIPUR, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THEGOVEMMENT OF
ASSAM/HOME AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI 780019
3:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI 781009
4:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (A.P.)
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI 781009
5:THE COMMANDANT
8TH ASSAM POLICE BATTALION
ABHAYAPURI
P.O. ABHAYAPURI
DIST. BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN 78338
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BANIK, MR. K SEMA,T SARKAR,MS F BEGUM
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Linked Case : CRP/0/0
SHRI BIJIT KUMAR RAY
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THEGOVEMMENT OF
ASSAM/HOME AFFAIRS
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006
------------
Advocate for : MS FIZA BEGUM
Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 15/05/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. S. Banik, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. F. Begum, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there a delay of 42 days in filing the appeal. Ms. S. Sarma, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam, submits that she has got no object to the delay being condoned, inasmuch as, no communication has been forthcoming despite having communicated the pendency of this application.
On considering the grounds for the delay as provided in paragraph 7 of the application, we find that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. Accordingly, the delay of 42 days is condoned. Registry to list the matter. IA is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant