Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1499/2026 of S A ENTERPRISE Vs ATUL JAIN on 14 May 2026
GAHC010090192026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1499/2026 S A ENTERPRISE A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT M.L. NEHRU ROAD, PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI- 781001, IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP (M), ASSAM,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010090192026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1499/2026
S A ENTERPRISE A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT
M.L. NEHRU ROAD, PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI- 781001, IN THE DISTRICT OF
KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, REP. HEREIN BY ITS PROPRIETOR ARMAN ALI, S/O- LATE RAMJAN ALI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O- LILADHAR BARUAH
ROAD, H.NO. 15, AMBARI, GHY-01, ASSAM
VERSUS
1: ATUL JAIN
COMMISSIONER, MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI, DEPTT. OF WATER
RESOURCES, RIVER DEVELOPMENT AND GANGA REJUVENATION, DELHI- 110001
2:SHRI S. ABASSI, I.A.S.
ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WATER RESOURCES
DEPTT. ADDRESS- BLOCK-B 3RD FLOOR ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR-06
DIST.- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
For the Applicant(s)
: Mr. AN Sarmah, Advocate.
For the Respondent(s)
: Ms. R Deka, Standing Counsel.
– B E F O R E –
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
-ORDER-
15.05.2026 This is an application filed for impleadment of the opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 to the accompanying application.
Page No.# 2/2
The reason for filing of the instant application, inasmuch as, the earlier contemnors in the accompanying application are no longer holding the posts and the present opposite parties are holding the post of the Chief Engineer and the Executive Engineer of the Water Resources Department.
Taking into account the above, this Court impleads both the opposite parties herein as respondent Nos. 5 & 6 to the accompanying contempt application.
The counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant is directed to file a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court within 7 (seven) days and the Registry shall on the basis of the said memo of parties and the present order make necessary changes in the cause-title of the accompanying contempt application and update the same in the CIS.
Interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant