Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1253/2022 of M/S SAGA PESTICIDE PVT LTD Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 14 May 2026
GAHC010034582022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1253/2022 M/S SAGA PESTICIDE PVT LTD REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI SAHADAT ALI AHMED, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SON OF ABDUL MATLEB, R/O- VILL.- KUMMULLI PARA,
GAHC010034582022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1253/2022
M/S SAGA PESTICIDE PVT LTD
REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI SAHADAT ALI AHMED, AGED
ABOUT 38 YEARS, SON OF ABDUL MATLEB, R/O- VILL.- KUMMULLI PARA, BARPETA, P.O. JASHIHATI PARA, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM AND HAVING
ITS REGISTERED ADDRESS AT SUBHRA KOTHI, 52 BIGHA, MONDAL
ROAD, MADHUPUR-815353, DIST.- DEOGHAR, JHARKHAND.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REP. BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND
HORTICULTURE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI-781022
ASSAM
3:M/S. SHRI RAM AGROCHEMICALS
PLOT NO. 68
DHEERKHEDA INDUSTRIAL AREA
MEERUT ROAD
HAPUR
PIN- 245101
UTTAR PRADESH.
4:M/S. GREENWOOD PESTICIDES PVT. LTD.
KHASRA NO. 152/13/2
VPO- ISMALLA-11 B
BERI ROAD SAMPLA
ROHTAK ROAD
PIN- 124501
HARYANA.
5:M/S. SUPER FORD INSECTICIDES LTD.
J-2/12
MALVIYA NAGAR
PIN- 110017
NEW DELHI.
6:M/S. NICHINO INDIA PVT. LTD.
A-24/25
APIE BALANAGAR (V) BALANAGAR (M) MEDCHAL- MALKAJGIRI (D)
HYDERABAD
PIN- 500037
TELANAGANA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K NAIR, MR. K P PATHAK,MS S SARMA HAZARIKA,MS
N NEWME
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, AGRI. DEPARTMENT, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
15.05.2026 Ms. H. K. Sumi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the instant writ petition, the NIT in question having spent its force, the matter has become infructous. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant