Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2124/2025 of SRI GOPAL BORO Vs PREMJIT SARMA AND ORS on 14 May 2026
GAHC010116892019 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2124/2025 SRI GOPAL BORO S/O LATE NAZIR BORO RESIDENT OF MANISHA AVENUE RUKMINIGAON FLAT NO. 103 2ND FLAT G S ROAD GUWAHATI 22 PO AND PS DISPUR GUWAHATI ASSAM
GAHC010116892019
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2124/2025
SRI GOPAL BORO
S/O LATE NAZIR BORO
RESIDENT OF MANISHA AVENUE
RUKMINIGAON
FLAT NO. 103
2ND FLAT G S ROAD
GUWAHATI 22
PO AND PS DISPUR GUWAHATI ASSAM
VERSUS
PREMJIT SARMA AND ORS
S/O LATE PRAFULLA CHANDRA SARMA
DIRECTOR
M/S MANISHA BUILD AND TRADE PVT. LTD.
RESIDENT OF 11
MUKUNDA PATH
RUKMINIGAON
GUWAHATI-22
P.O. AND P.S. DISPUR
KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
GUWAHATI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
3:GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMDA)
REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN
GMDA
STATEFED BUILDING
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-5.
4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
STATEFED BUILDING
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-5.
5:JEUTI DAS
W/O SRI SATYAJIT BHUYAN
R/O FLAT NO. 201
MANISHA AVENUE
RUKMINIGAON
GUWAHATI-22
P.O. AND P.S. DISPUR
DIST. KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR A K CHAUDHURY
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for PREMJIT SARMA AND ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 15.05.2026 Heard Mr. A. K. Chaudhury, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner/respondent No. 1; Mr. N. Das, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent No. 2; Mr. S. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and Mr. G. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5. By way of this intelocutory application, the applicant, i.e., Sri Gopal Boro, is seeking his impleadment, as respondent in the connected writ petition being WP(C) No. 3455/2019.
The applicant is the land owner of the land in which the petitioner has developed the land by virtue of his agreement with the land owner. The issue involved in the writ petition is as regards the demolition of the aforesaid construction constructed by the promoter/petitioner on the ground of alleged deviation as raised by GMDA. In view of the aforesaid, though the presence of the applicant may not be necessary for maintaining the writ petition; however, his presence appears to be proper and essential for effective and full adjudication of the connected writ petition. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands allowed. Resultantly, the applicant, i.e., Sri Gopal Boro, be impleaded as respondent No. 4 in the connected writ petition. Let an amended cause title be submitted before the Registry for doing the needful. JUDGE Comparing Assistant