Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4043/2025 of SMTI BIDISHA TALUKDAR AND 3 ORS Vs THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND 2 ORS on 13 May 2026
GAHC010159782025 2026:GAU-AS:6766 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4043/2025 SMTI BIDISHA TALUKDAR AND 3 ORS D/O AMARENDRA TALUKDAR, R/O AMULAPATTY P.S. AND DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM. 2: SRI CHANDAN DUTTA S/O LATE DIMBESWAR DUTTA
GAHC010159782025
2026:GAU-AS:6766
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4043/2025
SMTI BIDISHA TALUKDAR AND 3 ORS
D/O AMARENDRA TALUKDAR,
R/O AMULAPATTY
P.S. AND DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM.
2: SRI CHANDAN DUTTA
S/O LATE DIMBESWAR DUTTA
R/O NAMTI KUKURACHUWA
P.S. NAMTI
DIST. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM.
3: SRI PRADIP CHUTIA
S/O LATE BIDYADHAR CHUTIA
R/O BANMUKH DEHINGIA GAON
P.S. AND DIST. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
4: AZMAN ALI
S/O ARMAN ALI
R/O VILL- AND P.O. SANIADI
P.S. HAJO
DIST. KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, GAUHATI HIGH COURT, GAUHATI, ASSAM, PIN-781001.
2:THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
SIVASAGAR
DIST. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
PIN-785640.
3:THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
SIVASAGAR
DIST. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
PIN-785640
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. D Das, Senior Advocate Mr. K Mohd.
Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. HK Das, Senior Standing Counsel Gauhati High Court, Guwahati Mr. N K Sarma B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.05.2026
Mr. D Das, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. K Mohammed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that taking into account the stand which has been taken by the respondents, the petitioners cannot proceed in the instant writ petition in the manner in which the writ petition has been filed as there appears to be apparent formal defects.
2. The learned Senior Counsel, therefore, submits that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to re-file.
3. Taking into account the above, this Court, therefore, closes the instant writ petition on withdrawal.
4. Liberty given to the petitioners to re-file, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant