Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/8277/2019 of HOKDAR TERANG Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. on 13 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010274562019 2026:GAU-AS:6659 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8277/2019 HOKDAR TERANG S/O LT. DR. SARSING TERANG, R/O VILL. RONGNIHAG, 2 WARD NO. 3, P.O. AND P.S. DIPHU, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, PIN-782460 VERSUS THE STATE OF

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010274562019

2026:GAU-AS:6659

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/8277/2019

HOKDAR TERANG

S/O LT. DR. SARSING TERANG, R/O VILL. RONGNIHAG, 2 WARD NO. 3, P.O.

AND P.S. DIPHU, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, PIN-782460

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.

REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (HIGHER) DEPTT. DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN-781006

2:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION

ASSAM

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI

PIN-781019

3:THE GOVERNING BODY

NORTH LAKHIMPUR COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS)OLD COLLEGE ROAD

NORTH LAKHIMPUR

P.O. KHELMATI

DIST. LAKHIMPUR

ASSAM

PIN-787031 REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT

4:THE PRINCIPAL CUM SECRETARY

OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF NORTH LAKHIMPUR COLLEGE

(AUTONOMOUS) OLD COLLEGE ROAD

NORTH LAKHIMPUR

P.O. KHELMATI

DIST. LAKHIMPUR

ASSAM

PIN-787031

Page No.# 2/2

5:NAYANA TERON

ADDRESS- NORTH LAKHIMPUR COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS) OLD

COLLEGE ROAD

NORTH LAKHIMPUR

P.O. KHELMATI

DIST. LAKHIMPUR

ASSAM

PIN-78703

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T DEURI, MR. B TANTI,MRS. R S DEURI

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, MR. A NARZARI,MR. A NARZARI (R-3),MRS.

B HAZARIKA,MR. A NARZARI (R-4),MR. P PATHAK

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 14.05.2026

Ms. R. S. Deori, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that on perusal of the affidavit filed by respondent No. 5, there is no merit in the matter and therefore, she would like not to press this writ petition.

Mr. S. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Higher Education Department, and Mr. A. Narzary, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5, are present.

Accordingly, writ petition stands closed as not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead