Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/1223/2026 of DIRECTOR GENERAL SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, Vs SRI BHUPEN DAIMARY AND 5 ORS on 12 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010093462025 2026:GAU-AS:6601 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1223/2026 DIRECTOR GENERAL SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM COMPLEX (EAST GATE), LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN 110003 VERSUS SRI BHUPEN DAIMARY

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010093462025

2026:GAU-AS:6601

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/1223/2026

DIRECTOR GENERAL SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM COMPLEX (EAST GATE), LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN 110003

VERSUS

SRI BHUPEN DAIMARY AND 5 ORS

S/O SRI HAREN DAIMARY, R/O VILLAGE MAINAMATA PATHAR, P.O.

-MAINAMATA, P.S. -GOBARDHANA, DISTRICT- BAKSA, ASSAM, PIN 781315

2:THE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER

SPORTS AUTHORITY OF ASSAM

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

3:THE STATE OF ASSAM

TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVT. OF ASSAM

SPORTS AND YOUTH WELFARE DEPARTMENT

ASSAM JANATA BHAWAN

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (BLDG.)

CHANDMARI

GUWAHATI-3

5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (BLDG.) ATTACHED TO SPORTS

AUTHORITY OF ASSAM

CHANDMARI

Page No.# 2/2

GUWAHATI-3

6:THE UNION OF INDIA

TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY

MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS

DEPARTMENT OF SPORTS

SHASTRI BHAWAN

DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD

NEW DELHI

PIN- 11000

Advocate for the petitioner(s): Ms. A Gayan Advocate for the respondent(s):

B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

13.05.2026

Ms. A Gayan, the learned Central Government Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that she has written instructions for withdrawal of the writ petition.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead