Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/687/2026 of M/S GANESH PRASAD SINGH Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS on 12 May 2026
GAHC010024252026 2026:GAU-AS:6614 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/687/2026 M/S GANESH PRASAD SINGH ( A PARTNERSHIP FIRM) REGISTERED OFFICE AT 38/147, SRI HARI NIWAS, BEHIND NARAYANI TOWER, HEMU NAGAR, BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH -
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010024252026
2026:GAU-AS:6614
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/687/2026
M/S GANESH PRASAD SINGH
(A PARTNERSHIP FIRM) REGISTERED OFFICE AT 38/147, SRI HARI NIWAS, BEHIND NARAYANI TOWER, HEMU NAGAR, BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH - 495004, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY/ PERSON SHRI
DIBYO JYOTI TALUKDAR, SON OF SRI NAGEN CHANDRA TALUKDAR, RANGIA STATION ROAD, WARD NO. 1, RANGIA, P.O. AND P.S. RANGIA, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781354.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL
BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110001.
2:THE NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
MALIGAON
GUWAHATI
ASSAM- 781011
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER.
3:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER
NFR
MALIGAON
GUWAHATI - 781011.
4:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER
RANGIYA DIVISION
RANGIA
ASSAM - 781354.
5:THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER
NFR
RANGIYA DIVISION
RANGIA
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM - 781354.
6:THE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER
NFR
RANGIYA DIVISION
RANGIA
ASSAM 781354
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. Pathak, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Roy, CGC
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.05.2026
Mr. B. Pathak, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is not inclined to pursue with the instant proceedings and in that regard, had issued a communication to him. The said communication has been placed before this Court which is and kept on record and marked with the letter “X”.
2. Mr. S. S. Roy, the learned CGC appears on behalf of the Respondents.
3. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant