Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3886/2023 of M/S BRAHMAPUTRA FILLING STATION Vs THE SPL COMMISSIONER AND SPL SECRETARY, GOVT OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 12 May 2026
GAHC010144002023 2026:GAU-AS:6610 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3886/2023 M/S BRAHMAPUTRA FILLING STATION CD ROAD , NORTH LAKHIMPUR, LAKHIMPUR, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR- SHYAMAL SHARMA BARUAH, C/O- LATE SAILEN SARMA BARUAH,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010144002023
2026:GAU-AS:6610
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3886/2023
M/S BRAHMAPUTRA FILLING STATION
CD ROAD , NORTH LAKHIMPUR, LAKHIMPUR,
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR- SHYAMAL SHARMA BARUAH, C/O- LATE SAILEN SARMA BARUAH, JAPISAJIA, K,B ROAD, NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN-787001
VERSUS
THE SPL COMMISSIONER AND SPL SECRETARY, GOVT OF ASSAM AND 3
ORS
PUBLIC WORKS (B AND NH) DEPARTMENT, BLOCK B, GROUND FLOOR, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (NH WORKS)
ASSAM
O/O THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PWD BUILDING
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-781003
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Page No.# 2/2
O/O THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
NAGAON NH DIVISION
DIST-NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782001
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
O/O THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NORTH LAKHIMPUR
DIST- LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
PIN-78700
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. A Saikia Advocate for the respondent(s):
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
13.05.2026
Mr. A Saikia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the cause of action for which the present writ petition was filed is no longer there as the petitioner has been redressed.
2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition, therefore, stands closed as infructuous.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant