Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Crl.)/490/2026 of MANGAL SINGHA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. on 12 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010072422026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/490/2026 MANGAL SINGHA S/O. LT. MOHAN SINGHA, R/O. VILL.- NADIAPUR WARD NO. 3, P/O. KALACHARA, P/S. LALCHERA, DIST. DHARMA NAGAR, TRIPURA, 799250 VERSUS THE

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010072422026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/490/2026

MANGAL SINGHA

S/O. LT. MOHAN SINGHA, R/O. VILL.- NADIAPUR WARD NO. 3, P/O.

KALACHARA, P/S. LALCHERA, DIST. DHARMA NAGAR, TRIPURA, 799250

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

REP BY THE PP, ASSAM

2:SRI MIHIR DAS

S/O. LT. MUNINDRA DAS

R/O. BONGAON

NEAR INCOME TAX OFFICE

H.NO. 31 P/S. BASISTHA

DIST. KAMRUP (M)

781028 ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M K BROWN, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0

MANGAL SINGHAASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REP BY THE PP

ASSAM

------------

Page No.# 2/2

Advocate for : MANISHA KAREN BROWN

Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 13.05.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J)

Heard Ms. M. K. Brown, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 945 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Addl. PP, Assam submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. On considering the grounds of delay and keeping in view the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, we find that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. Accordingly, the delay of 945 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same accordingly. I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead