Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/1467/2026 of RAMESH SHAH Vs PALLAB KUMAR DAS AND ANR on 12 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010087712026 2026:GAU-AS:6608 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1467/2026 RAMESH SHAH S/O- LATE MISHRI SHAH R/O- HOUSE NO 19, DINESH OJHA PATH, KAMAKHYA NAGAR, RAJGHAR LINK ROAD,GUWAHATI-781005, KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010087712026

2026:GAU-AS:6608

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1467/2026

RAMESH SHAH

S/O- LATE MISHRI SHAH R/O- HOUSE NO 19, DINESH OJHA PATH, KAMAKHYA NAGAR, RAJGHAR LINK ROAD,GUWAHATI-781005, KAMRUP

(METRO), ASSAM

VERSUS

PALLAB KUMAR DAS AND ANR

THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING (WATER), HENGERABARI HEALTH COMPLEX, HENGRABARI RD, LICHUBAGAN, HENGRABARI, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, -781036.

2:SRI SANJIB PATHAK

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PHE) STORE AND WORKSHOP

DIVISION BETKUCHI GUWAHATI-78103

Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. M Das Advocate for the respondent(s):

B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Page No.# 2/2 13.05.2026

Heard Mr. M Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/applicant.

2. The instant application has been filed pursuant to the leave granted by this Court vide the order dated 01.12.2025 passed in the accompanying contempt application.

3. It is the opinion of this Court that the opposite parties in the instant application are necessary for the purpose of an effective compliance of the order dated 05.04.2024 passed in WP(C)No.2455/2023. Accordingly, the opposite parties herein are impleaded as respondent/contemnor Nos.3 and 4 to the accompanying contempt application.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is directed to file a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court within 7(seven) days from today and the Registry shall on the basis of the fresh memo of parties along with the instant order make the necessary corrections in the cause-title of the accompanying contempt petition and update the same in the CIS.

5. The interlocutory application, accordingly, stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead