Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1004/2025 of M/S MEGHALAYA CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLY COMPANY Vs HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED AND 3 ORS on 12 May 2026
GAHC010035872025 2026:GAU-AS:6604 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1004/2025 M/S MEGHALAYA CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLY COMPANY A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT PATAN, TEHSIL- NEEM KA THANA, DISTRICT- SIKAR
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010035872025
2026:GAU-AS:6604
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1004/2025
M/S MEGHALAYA CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLY COMPANY
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT PATAN, TEHSIL- NEEM KA THANA, DISTRICT- SIKAR (RAJASTHAN), REPRESETED BY ITS
PARTNER SUNIL DEWAN, S/O- LATE MADAN LAL DEWAN, RESIDENT OF
124, TULSI RAM MARG, VAISHALI NAGAR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN-302021.
VERSUS
HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE HEAD (CPG), HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 3RD
FLOOR, NBCC SQUARE, PLOT NO.- III F/2 ACTION AREA III, NEW TOWN, RAJARHAT, P.O. AKANDAKESHARI, KOLKATA-700135.
2:THE HEAD (CPG)
HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED
3RD FLOOR
NBCC SQUARE
PLOT NO. III F/2 ACTION AREA III
NEW TOWN
RAJARHAT
P.O. AKANDAKESHARI
KOLKATA-700135.
3:UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS
NEW DELHI-110001.
4:THE ZONAL HEAD (N.E.)
HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED
H/O TRIDIB KUMAR BORKAKOTY
1ST FLOOR
Page No.# 2/2
AEC ROAD
JALUKBARI
GUWAHATI-781014
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.A. Ahmed, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.05.2026
Mr. A.A. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the instant writ petition has become infructuous inasmuch as the work order has already been issued to the Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner would not like to press the instant writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant