Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/388/2023 of BIKASH KUMAR MORE Vs ASHOK K.K. MEENA AND 3 ORS on 11 May 2026
GAHC010131302023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/388/2023 BIKASH KUMAR MORE SON OF LATE CHIRANJILAL MORE, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 4, NEAR DERGAON CHARIALI, DERGAON, DIST.- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785614. VERSUS
GAHC010131302023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/388/2023
BIKASH KUMAR MORE
SON OF LATE CHIRANJILAL MORE,
RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 4, NEAR DERGAON CHARIALI, DERGAON, DIST.- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785614.
VERSUS
ASHOK K.K. MEENA AND 3 ORS
CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR,
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA,
BARAKHAMBA ROAD, NEW DELHI, 110066.
2:RAJESH CHOUDHARY
GENERAL MANAGER (REGIONAL)
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
REGIONAL OFFICE
ASSAM REGION
PALTANBAZAR
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 781008.
3:UTPAL KALITA
ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (CONT.)
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
REGIONAL OFFICE
ASSAM REGION
PALTANBAZAR
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 781008.
4:ARVIND KUMAR PATHAK
DIVISIONAL MANAGER
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
DIVISIONAL OFFICE
JORHAT
ASSAM
PIN- 784001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A C BORBORA, MR. N BORPATRAGOHAIN,MR. U K NAIR
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 12.05.2026 Heard Mr. A. C. Borbora, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. N. Dev, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. A. C. Borbora, learned Senior Counsel, submits that after filing of the present contempt petition, various litigation developments have taken place. He further submits that he has received instructions from the petitioner not to press the instant contempt petition and seeks withdrawal of the same with liberty to file a fresh, if so required. In view of the aforesaid submission, the contempt petition stands closed at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to re-approach this Court, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant