Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5878/2017 of ABDUL QAYYUM SHEIKH and ANR. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM and 6 ORS. on 11 May 2026
GAHC010041432017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5878/2017 ABDUL QAYYUM SHEIKH and ANR. S/O- ABDUL BARI SHEIKH, VILL- KISMAT HASDAHA PART-III, P.O- KISMAT HASDAHA, P.S- DHUBRI, DIST- DHUBRI, PIN- 783334, ASSAM
GAHC010041432017
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5878/2017
ABDUL QAYYUM SHEIKH and ANR.
S/O- ABDUL BARI SHEIKH, VILL- KISMAT HASDAHA PART-III, P.O- KISMAT
HASDAHA, P.S- DHUBRI, DIST- DHUBRI, PIN- 783334, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 6 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY- 781006
2:THE DIRECTOR
SECONDARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI- 781010
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
DHUBRI
DIST- DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN- 7843301
4:INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
DHUBRI DISTT. CIRCLE
DHUBRI- 783331
5:THE MADRASSA MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
OF KISMAT HASDAHA SENIOR MADRASSA REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT AS
PER IMPUGNED O/DTD. 12.04.2017
.O- KISMAT HASDAHA
P.S- DHUBRI
DIST- DHUBRI
PIN- 783334
ASSAM
6:JAKIR HUSSAIN
PRESIDENT
MMDC
KISMAT HASDAHA SENIOR MADRASSA
VILL- DHARAMSALA PART-I
P.O- DHARAMSALA
DIST- DHUBRI
PIN- 783324
ASSAM
7:MEMBER SECRETARY AND SUPERINTENDENT
MMDC
KISMAT HAS DAHA SR. MADRASSA
P.O- KISMAT HASDAHA
DISRT- DHUBRI- 783334
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.M GOGOI, MR.S M H HAQUE,MR.B SINHA
Advocate for the Respondent : FOR CAVEATOR, MR.A RAHMAN,SC, SECONDARY
EDUCATION,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 12.05.2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. Peruse the Lawazima Court’s order dated 24.03.2025, which reflects that despite several opportunities granted, no steps have been taken by the petitioner. Before both the Lawazima Court and this Court, the petitioners remains unrepresented. Thus, it appears that the petitioners are no longer interested to pursue this matter.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant