Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2377/2026 of SRI PRATUL KUMAR GOSWAMI Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHRS on 10 May 2026
GAHC010078992026 2026:GAU-AS:6404 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2377/2026 SRI PRATUL KUMAR GOSWAMI , S/O LATE NAGENDRA NATH GOSWAMI ADDRESS 3C, ARATI PLAZA, OPPOSITE GAUHATI COMMERCE COLLEGE, RG BARUAH ROAD, CHANDMARI,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010078992026
2026:GAU-AS:6404
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2377/2026
SRI PRATUL KUMAR GOSWAMI
, S/O LATE NAGENDRA NATH GOSWAMI ADDRESS 3C, ARATI PLAZA, OPPOSITE GAUHATI COMMERCE COLLEGE, RG BARUAH ROAD, CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI - 781003, DISTRICT - KAMRUPM, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHRS
, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI 110001.
2:THE CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL)
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
RAJGARH ROAD
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI - 781003
DISTRICT - KAMRUPM ASSAM.
3:THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL)
GUWAHATI CUM CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF
GRATUITY ACT
1972
GOPINATH NAGAR
GUWAHATI - 780016
DISTRICT - KAMRUPM
ASSAM.
4:ASSAM GOVERNMENT MARKETING CORPORATION LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
AMBARI
Page No.# 2/2
PIN 781001
DISTRICT KAMRUPM
ASSAM. - . PRO FORMA RESPONDEN
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Sarma, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. S.G. Baruah, CGC
Mr. G. Bokolial, Govt. Advocate
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 11.05.2026
Mr. M. Sarma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there are certain defects in the writ petition and, therefore, the petitioner would like to withdraw the instant writ petition without prejudice and with liberty to file a separate writ petition after removing the formal defects.
2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to re-file the writ petition after removing the formal defects.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant