Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/898/2026 of SHYAMAL BEZBORUAH Vs THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND ANR on 10 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010042992026 2026:GAU-AS:6392- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/898/2026 SHYAMAL BEZBORUAH SON OF LATE NARAYAN BEZBORUAH, RESIDENT OF MADHYAM KANDA, NORTH GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI - 781030, DISTRICT - KAMRUP, ASSAM.

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010042992026

2026:GAU-AS:6392-

DB

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/898/2026

SHYAMAL BEZBORUAH

SON OF LATE NARAYAN BEZBORUAH, RESIDENT OF MADHYAM KANDA, NORTH GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI - 781030, DISTRICT - KAMRUP, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, GAUHATI HIGH COURT, GUWAHATI -781001.

2:THE REGISTRAR GENERAL

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

GUWAHATI -78100

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P BHARDWAJ, R C ALOM,B PARASHAR,M RAHMAN

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GHC,

BEFORE

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

11-05-2026 (AD Choudhury, J)

Page No.# 2/2

1. Heard Ms. B Parashar, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. NK Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. HK Das, learned Senior counsel representing the Gauhati High Court, respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed for condonation of the delay of 82 days in filing the connected appeal against the judgment dated 14.08.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No. 1885/2024.

3. Perused the averments made in the application.

4. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have no instruction to object the present application.

5. After going through the averments made at paragraph Nos. 3,4,5,6 and 7 of the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicant/appellant for condoning the delay of 82 days in preferring the appeal.

6. We, therefore, condone the delay.

7. The interlocutory Application stands disposed off.

8. Registry to process the connected appeal and, if the same is found defect-free, shall list the same under appropriate heading, preferably on 20.07.2026.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead