Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/2389/2026 of TAIZUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 7 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010086492026 2026:GAU-AS:6370 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2389/2026 TAIZUL ISLAM S/O LATE HAZI KHODA BOKSH, VILL. FULERCHAR PART III, P.O. FULERCHAR, DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010086492026

2026:GAU-AS:6370

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/2389/2026

TAIZUL ISLAM

S/O LATE HAZI KHODA BOKSH, VILL. FULERCHAR PART III, P.O.

FULERCHAR, DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-

781006.

2:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ZILLA PARISHAD

HATSINGIMARI

P.O. HATSINGIMARI

DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR

ASSAM

PIN- 783135.

3:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

FEKAMARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT

P.O. FEKAMARI

DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR

ASSAM

PIN- 783135.

4:THE SECRETARY

FULERCHAR GAON PANCHAYAT

P.O. FULERCHAR

DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR

ASSAM

PIN- 783135

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D A KAIYUM, MR. M S MONDAL

Page No.# 2/2

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 08-05-2026 Heard Mr. D. A. Kaiyum, learned counsel for the petitioner, who, after realising that the representation for consideration of remission/extension in respect of the lease from Kokradanga to Dhubri Launch Ghat (Evening) under Fulerchar Gaon Panchayat, in the district of South Salmara Mankachar, was filed only on 21.04.2026, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh in future, if occasion arises. Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, PNRD, is present. Considering that the representation for remission/extension appears to have been filed on 21.04.2026 and that barely 15 days have elapsed since then, the prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead