Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6321/2022 of PRITAM NARZARY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. on 7 May 2026
GAHC010187582022 2026:GAU-AS:6472 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6321/2022 PRITAM NARZARY S/O SRI BIKASH NARZARY, R/O VILL-DAWAGURI NO. 1, P.O.-GOLADNAGI, P.S.-GOSAIGAON, DIST-KOKRAJHAR, BTAD, ASSAM, PIN-783361 VERSUS THE
GAHC010187582022
2026:GAU-AS:6472
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6321/2022
PRITAM NARZARY
S/O SRI BIKASH NARZARY, R/O VILL-DAWAGURI NO. 1, P.O.-GOLADNAGI, P.S.-GOSAIGAON, DIST-KOKRAJHAR, BTAD, ASSAM, PIN-783361
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
FOREST, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM
2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HEAD OF
FOREST
ASSAM
REHABARI
KAMRUP METRO
GUWAHATI-781008
3:THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (T)
LOWER ASSAM ZONE
KACHARIGHAT
GUWAHATI-781001
KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
4:THE CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
LOWER ASSAM SOCIAL FORESTRY CIRCLE
BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-783380
5:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
AIE VALLEY FOREST DIVISION
BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-783380
6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-78338
For the Petitioner(s) : XXXX
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. R. Gogoi, SC, Forest
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08.05.2026
None has appeared on behalf of the Petitioner on call. Mr. R. R. Gogoi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Forest Department.
2. Mr. R. R. Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Forest Department informed this Court on 27.04.2026 that the instant writ petition had already become infructuous. Under such circumstances, this Court enquired with the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner as to whether anything further survives in the present proceedings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner as was recorded in the order dated 27.04.2026, sought for a further opportunity as she had no instruction in the matter.
3. Taking into account that the Petitioner is not represented today, it appears that the Petitioner had lost interest in the present proceedings for which the instant writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant