Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/7079/2025 of SAMSERUDDIN AHMED AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. on 7 May 2026
GAHC010271812025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7079/2025 SAMSERUDDIN AHMED AND ANR S/O-SIDDIQUE ALI VILL-CHENIBARI P.O- BHERBHERI BILLP.S- DHULA DIST- DARRANG, ASSAM 2: ABDUL KUDDUS S/O-LT. MINNAT ALIVILL-
GAHC010271812025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/7079/2025
SAMSERUDDIN AHMED AND ANR
S/O-SIDDIQUE ALI
VILL-CHENIBARI
P.O- BHERBHERI BILLP.S- DHULA
DIST- DARRANG, ASSAM
2: ABDUL KUDDUS
S/O-LT. MINNAT ALIVILL- RAJAHAULI
P.O-BHERBHERI BILL P.S- DHULA
DIST- DARRANG
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,REVENUE AND
DISASTERMANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR,GUWAHATI-06
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DARRANG AT MANGALDAI
ASSAM.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICE
PUB MANGALDAI REVENUE CIRCLE
MANGALDAI
ASSAM
4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD(R)
DARRANG AT MANGALDAI
ASSAM.
5:SRI BICHITRA BASUMATARY
CONTRACTOR OF THE ROAD
NAMELY - FROM PUTHIA GHATTO PUTHIMARI ROAD MAJORSUBA TO
CHENIBARI RAJAHAULIUNDER SIPAJHAR KALAIGAONCENTRAL ROAD
CIRCLE
SIPAJHAR
PO- BHERBHERI
PSDHULA
DIST- DARRANG
ASSAM.
6:MAZIBAR RAHMAN
S/O-LT. MINNAT ALI
VILL- RAJAHAULI
P.O- CHAMUAKHATP.S- DHULADIST- DARRANG
ASSAM PIN-784190
7:SARFUL IMANUR RAHMAN
S/O- MAZIBAR RAHMAN
VILL- RAJAHAULIP.O- CHAMUA KHATP.S- DHULADIST- DARRANG
ASSAMPIN-78419
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MAHMUD, MRS. M SAIKIA,S SEKH,A A
HAZARIKA,MR S H MAHMUD
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, PWD ROAD,SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08-05-2026 It is submitted by Mr. M.U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioners that the relief sought for in this writ petition has already been redressed as reflected in the affidavit-in- opposition filed by the State respondent. Ms. G. Hazarika, learned standing counsel for the Revenue Department and Mr. J.
Handique, learned State counsels are present. As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands closed as the relief sought for by the petitioners is stated to have been redressed.
JUDGE. Comparing Assistant