Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6174/2016 of ARDHENDU CHANDRA CHAKRABORTY and ANR. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 7 May 2026
GAHC010027222016 2026:GAU-AS:6371 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6174/2016 ARDHENDU CHANDRA CHAKRABORTY and ANR. S/O LT. SUBODH CHANDRA CHAKRABORTY 2: KRISHNA CHAKRABORTY W/O SRI ARDHENDU CH. CHAKRABORTY BOTH ARE R/O RISHI
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010027222016
2026:GAU-AS:6371
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6174/2016
ARDHENDU CHANDRA CHAKRABORTY and ANR.
S/O LT. SUBODH CHANDRA CHAKRABORTY
2: KRISHNA CHAKRABORTY
W/O SRI ARDHENDU CH. CHAKRABORTY
BOTH ARE R/O RISHI AUROBINDA LANE
NORTH BONGAIGAON
P.O.
P.S. and DIST- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-78338
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REP. BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BONGAIGAON, P.O.
BONGAIGAON, ASSAM
2:OFFICER IN CHARGE
BONGAIGAON POLICE STATION
P.O.
P.S. and DIST- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
3:DEBDULAL CHAKRABORTY ALIAS MATTHEW SAN RAZ
S/O SRI ARDHENDU CH. CHAKRABORTY
4:PRATIBHA NARZARY
W/O SRI DEBDULAL CHAKRABORTY ALIAS MATTHEW SAN RAZ
BOTH RESPONDENT NOS. 3and4 ARE PRESENTLY R/O RISHI AUROBINDA
LANE
BONGAIGAON
P.O.
P.S. and DIST- BONGAIGAON
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM
PIN-78338
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.B J MUKHERJEE, MS.L SHARMA,MR.S S SHARMA,MRA
SHARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : , MR.A NARZERY(R- 3&4),,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08-05-2026 Mr. B. J. Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Mr. A. Narzery, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 3 & 4, is present.
Accordingly, writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant