Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./727/2026 of TURBONG RONGHANG AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 7 May 2026
GAHC010044962026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./727/2026 TURBONG RONGHANG AND ANR S/O CHANDRA RONGHANG, R/O RONGMONJIR, P.S. DIPHU, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM. 2: SRI BIDYASING INGTI S/O JAYRAM INGTI R/O
GAHC010044962026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./727/2026
TURBONG RONGHANG AND ANR
S/O CHANDRA RONGHANG, R/O RONGMONJIR, P.S. DIPHU, DIST. KARBI
ANGLONG, ASSAM.
2: SRI BIDYASING INGTI
S/O JAYRAM INGTI
R/O KATHAR INGTI GAON
BALIPATHAR
P.S. BOKAJAN
DIST. KARBI ANGLONG
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. A. MEDHI, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08.05.2026
1. Heard Ms. A. Medhi, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioners as well as Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent.
2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioners, namely, Turbong Ronghang and Bidyasing Ingti, praying for grant of bail in connection with NDPS Case No.87/2025 arising out of Khatkhati PS Case No. 58/2025 under Sections 21(C)/29 of NDPS Act.
3. The gist of the allegation is about recovery of commercial quantity of psychotropic substances in the nature of “SAMPEX” capsules from the petitioners.
4. As per the prosecution case, the alleged contraband was recovered from a vehicle in which both the petitioners were present.
5. The scanned TCR is received and I have produced the relevant portions thereof.
6. Both the seizure witnesses have stated about witnessing the recovery of the contraband from the vehicle bearing registration No. AS-09J-3090.
7. The informant has also supported the allegations in the statements recorded during investigation.
8. I find from the record that vide order dated 15/10/2025, charge has already been framed against the petitioners and prosecution evidence has also started.
9. In the given facts and circumstances, the rigors of Section 37 would apply in the instant case against the accused and the Court will be statutorily barred from granting bail at this stage. It is hoped that the learned trial court would endeavour to expeditiously complete the trial.
10. Accordingly, this bail application stands rejected and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant