Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2378/2026 of GOPAL CHANDRA RAY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS on 7 May 2026
GAHC010087042026 2026:GAU-AS:6368 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2378/2026 GOPAL CHANDRA RAY C/O LATE RAHI DAS, R/O VILL HALDIBARI PART I, P/S-MERERCHAR, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM 2: CHETAN CHANDRA GHOSH SO LATE MANGAL CHANDRA
GAHC010087042026
2026:GAU-AS:6368
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2378/2026
GOPAL CHANDRA RAY
C/O LATE RAHI DAS, R/O VILL HALDIBARI PART I, P/S-MERERCHAR, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM
2: CHETAN CHANDRA GHOSH
SO LATE MANGAL CHANDRA GHOSH
RO VILL 143 KIRTTANAPARA PART II
PS ABHAYAPURI
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
3: SUNIL GHOSH
SO LATE RAKHAL GHOSH
RO VILL 143 KIRTTANAPARA PART II
PS ABHAYAPURI
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
4: MIR IMRAN HASSAN
SO ANOWAR HUSSAIN
RO 160 TUPAKARCHAR
PS ABHAYAPURI
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
5: ABDUL BAREK
SO LATE KHAYER UDDIN
RO VILL A 160 TUPAKARCHAR
PS ABHAYAPURI
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
6: ACHAN ALI
SO LATE FULCHAN ALI
RO VILL KACHARIPETI PART III
PS ABHAYAPURI
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
7: KITAB ALI SHEIKH
SO LATE KURABAN ALI
RO VILL 161 HALADIBARI PART II
PS MERERCHAR
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
8: INTAJ ALI
SO LATE NUR BAKSA
RO VILL KACHARIPATI PART III
PS ABHAYAPURI
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
9: JUL HUCHEIN
SO LATE ABDUL HOCHEN
RO VILL 161 HALADIBARI PART II
PS MERERCHAR
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
10: SAMSUL HOQUE
SO BHULU SHEIKH
RO VILL 161 HALADIBARI PART II
PS MERERCHAR
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, FOREST DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-06
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
BONGAIGAON REVENUE CIRCLE
ASSAM
4:THE CO DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
ABHAYAPURI
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS M BORAH, A N HUSSAIN,MRS. B GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST, SC, REVENUE,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08-05-2026 Mr. A. N. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners, upon realising that the matter pertains to protection of the environment, fairly submits that she may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition, to avail the appropriate remedy/forum available under law. Mr. K. P. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department, appears for respondent No. 1 and Mr. J. Handique, learned State Counsel, appears for respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant