Gauhati High Court
AB/781/2026 of SRI SATYANDRA MORAN ALAIS SATYENDRA MORAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 6 May 2026
GAHC010072592026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/781/2026 SRI SATYANDRA MORAN ALAIS SATYENDRA MORAN S/O SRI PILESWAR MORAN, RESIDENT OF HUKANGURI NAGAON, PS DOOMDOMA, DIST TINSUKIA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010072592026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/781/2026
SRI SATYANDRA MORAN ALAIS SATYENDRA MORAN
S/O SRI PILESWAR MORAN,
RESIDENT OF HUKANGURI NAGAON, PS DOOMDOMA, DIST TINSUKIA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY PP ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HASAN, MS. S SAIKIA,MR. A HASAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07.05.2026
Heard Mr. N. Hasan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
2. This petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed by the petitioner, namely, Satyandra Moran @ Satyendra Moran, apprehending arrest in connection with Doomdooma P.S. Case No. 41/2026 registered u/s 21(b) of the NDPS Act.
Page No.# 2/2
3. The prosecution case is that on 10/3/2026 an FIR was lodged stating that on that day an information was received about concealment of drugs in the house of the petitioner located at Hukanguri Nagaon under Doomdoma PS in the district of Tinsukia. Accordingly, a search operation was conducted 0.7 grams of herion without soap boxes was seized along with cash of more than one lakh.
4. The case diary, as called for, has been received.
5. The learned Additional Public prosecutor submits that as per the investigation, the petitioner is stated to be prima facie involved in peddling of drugs in that area. The statements of two seizure witnesses have been placed before me from the case diary and they have also supported the seizure of the contraband.
6. Investigation is in progress and at this stage at least it would not be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail and accordingly, the bail petition stands rejected and disposed of.
7. Return back the case.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant