Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Crl.)/1333/2025 of JOGESH PATHAK Vs ON THE DEATH OF ROMA KANTA RABHA, HIS LEGAL HEIRS SRI AMARJYOTI RABHA on 5 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010270362025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1333/2025 JOGESH PATHAK S/O LATE DANDI CHARAN PATHAK, RESIDENT OF KARIPARA, PO AND PS MATIA, DIST GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF ROMA KANTA RABHA, HIS

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010270362025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1333/2025

JOGESH PATHAK

S/O LATE DANDI CHARAN PATHAK,

RESIDENT OF KARIPARA, PO AND PS MATIA, DIST GOALPARA, ASSAM

VERSUS

ON THE DEATH OF ROMA KANTA RABHA, HIS LEGAL HEIRS SRI

AMARJYOTI RABHA

S/O LATE ROMA KANTA RABHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHANTI NAGAR

GOALPARA TOWN, PS AND DIST GOALPARA, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J PAYENG, MS A PAYENG

Advocate for the Respondent : ,

Linked Case : Crl.Rev.P./183/2014

JOGESH PATHAK

S/O LT. DANDI CHARAN PATHAK VILL- KARIPARA P.O. and P.S. MATIA DIST.

GOALPARA

ASSAM.

VERSUS

ROMA KANTA RABHA

S/O LT. NOWARAM RABHA R/O VILL- SHANTI NAGAR GOALPARA TOWN

P.O. BALADMARI

P.S. GOALPARA

DIST. GOALPARA

Page No.# 2/2

ASSAM.

------------

Advocate for : MRJ PAYENG

Advocate for : appearing for ROMA KANTA RABHA

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 06.05.2026

Heard Mr. D. Uperty, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this interlocutory application seeking substitution of the sole respondent Roma Kanta Rabha by Amarjyoti Rabha on the ground that said Roma Kanta Rabha expired on 27.05.2022. A copy of death certificate has also been annexed. It is submitted in the main matter i.e. criminal revision petition has been filed against the conviction and sentence under the N.I. Act which is upheld by the learned trial court. The revision petitioner has already paid the monetary compensation but the learned trial court below had also passed a sentence of imprisonment. Therefore, he has prayed that Amarjyoti Rabha may be substituted in place of Roma Kanta Rabha. The name of Amarjyoti Rabha be substituted in place of Roma Kanta Rabha. The petitioner shall submit a fresh copy of cause title, in the main case. With the above observation, the I/A stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead