Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/7376/2016 of RAJEN DEURI and 3 ORS. Vs STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS. on 5 May 2026
GAHC010209302016 2026:GAU-AS:6139 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7376/2016 RAJEN DEURI and 3 ORS. S/O. LT. SUREN DEURI, VILL. ANANDAPUR DEURI GAON RAJARH DEURI GAON, P.S. BIHPURIA, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM. 2: SIMARANI DEURI
GAHC010209302016
2026:GAU-AS:6139
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/7376/2016
RAJEN DEURI and 3 ORS.
S/O. LT. SUREN DEURI, VILL. ANANDAPUR DEURI GAON RAJARH DEURI
GAON, P.S. BIHPURIA, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM.
2: SIMARANI DEURI
W/O. SADANANDA DEURI
VILL. BANDERDEWA KACHIKATA
P.S. BIHPURIA
DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM.
3: SRI BOLORAM DEURI
S/O. SANYA SINGH DEURI
VILL. KAJAR CHAPORI KINAPATHER JARABARI
P.S. NARAYANPUR
DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM.
4: PARTHA PATIM DEURI
S/O. SRI PRAJAPATI DEURI
VILL. PADMAPUR DEURI GAON TUNJAN
DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMM. and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, WPT and BC
DEPTT., ASSAM, SACHIVALYA, DISPUR, GHY.-06.
2:THE DIRECTOR
WPT and BC DEPTT.
ASSAM
SACHIVALAYA
DISPUR
GHY.-06.
3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER
LAKHIMPUR
DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM.
4:THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER
LAKHIMPUR
DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM.
5:THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
REP. BY THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER
HOUSE FED COMPLEX
DISPUR
GHY.-06.
6:THE SECRETARY
ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
HOUSE FED COMPLEX
DISPUR
GHY.-06
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S BORTHAKUR, MS.P BORA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, ADDL. AG, ASSAM,SC, ELECTION
COMMISSION.,MR.Y DOLOI(R- 1-6)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 06.05.2026
Mr. U. S. Bora, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that he has an instructions not to press this writ petition.
Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on not being pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant