Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1389/2026 of MRS PARINITA BORA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 5 May 2026
GAHC010134702019 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1389/2026 MRS PARINITA BORA W/O SRI MUKTA SAIKIA VILLAGE BATAMARI P.O. GHURAMARA DISTRICTLAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN 787032 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE
GAHC010134702019
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1389/2026
MRS PARINITA BORA
W/O SRI MUKTA SAIKIA VILLAGE BATAMARI
P.O. GHURAMARA
DISTRICTLAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
PIN 787032
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
EDUCATION HIGHER DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY EDUCATION (HIGHER)
DEPARTMENT
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI781006.
4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
5:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19
ASSAM.
6:HARHI COLLEGE
LAKHIMPUR REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL.
7:SMTI PRATIMA CHETIA
D/O PHANI CHETIA
A RESIDENT OF CHETIA GAON
HARHI SAPATIA
IN THE DISTRICT OF LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM-787058
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR A C BORBORA
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 06.05.2026
Heard Mr. M. Smith, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that this application is filed for impleadment of Smt. Pratima Chetia as respondent No.7 in view of the order passed by the Division Bench in the Writ Appeal filed by Smt. Pratima Chetia. Mr. J. I. Borbhuiya, learned counsel submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondent No.7 to be impleaded and he has also filed his power. Ms. D. D. Barman, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate for the respondent No.1; Mr. A. R. Tahbildar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 5; Ms. R. M. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department for the respondent No.4 and Mr. H. P. Neog, learned counsel for the respondent No.6 have no objections to the prayer made in the application. Accordingly, impleadment of Smt. Pratima Chetia as respondent No.7 in the main writ petition is allowed as prayed for. I.A. is accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant