Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4898/2025 of M/S CONSULTING ENGINEER NG Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. on 5 May 2026
GAHC010161602025 2026:GAU-AS:6210 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4898/2025 M/S CONSULTING ENGINEER NG A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REPRESENTED BY NIRMALI GOGOI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, D/O PRABHAT GOGOI, REGISTERED OFFICE AT H/NO. 46,
GAHC010161602025
2026:GAU-AS:6210
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4898/2025
M/S CONSULTING ENGINEER NG
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REPRESENTED BY NIRMALI GOGOI, AGED ABOUT
35 YEARS, D/O PRABHAT GOGOI, REGISTERED OFFICE AT H/NO. 46, SIMANTA PATH, BASISTHA CHARIALI, GUWAHATI-781029, DIST- KAMRUP
(M), ASSMA, PRINCIPAL OFFICE AT CHRISTIAN MISSION SCHOOL, MISSION PATTY, WARD NO. 3 OF GOLAGHAT TOWN, MOUZA- MOUKHOWA, P.O., P.S. AND DIST- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785621
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, POWER ELECTRICITY
DEPARTMENT, J BLOCK, LOK SEWA BHAWAN, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
2:ASSAM POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED (APGCL)
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
BIJULI BHAWAN
3RD FLOOR
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI-781001
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
3:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE ASSAM POWER GENERATION
CORPORATION LIMITED (APGCL)
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BIJULI BHAWAN
3RD FLOOR
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI-781001
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
4:SAURAV SAIKIA
CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (H AND C)
I/C APGCL
BIJULI BHAWAN
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI-781001
ASSAM
5:LAKWA THERMAL POWER STATION
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER
MAIBELLA
P.O.- SUFFRY
DIST- CHARAIDEO
ASSAM
PIN-78568
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. D. Roy, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Nath, Sr. GA
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
06.05.2026
Heard Mr. S. D. Roy, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. D. Nath, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the APDCL.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, taking into account that the disputes in the present proceedings would require factual adjudication, the Petitioner would like to withdraw the instant writ petition and avail remedies in terms with Clause 19
of Chapter 3 (“Instructions to the Bidders”) of the Special Conditions of the Contract document.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in terms with Clause 19 of the “Instructions to the Bidders” for settlement of disputes.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant