Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4361/2018 of MANAGEMENT OF HOTEL RAJMAHAL Vs HITRAM RAJBONSHI AND ANR. on 4 May 2026
GAHC010139872018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4361/2018 MANAGEMENT OF HOTEL RAJMAHAL A.T. ROAD, GUWAHATI- 781001, REPRESENTED BY SRI MANOJ SETHIA, AGED ABOUT- 47 YEARS. VERSUS HITRAM RAJBONSHI AND ANR. VILLAGE-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010139872018
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4361/2018
MANAGEMENT OF HOTEL RAJMAHAL
A.T. ROAD, GUWAHATI- 781001, REPRESENTED BY SRI MANOJ SETHIA, AGED ABOUT- 47 YEARS.
VERSUS
HITRAM RAJBONSHI AND ANR.
VILLAGE- OUTALA, P.O.- KENDUA, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. P. Sarmah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. K. Sen, Advocate BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
05.05.2026 Heard Mr. P. Sarmah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. B. K. Sen, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the Respondent No.1.
Page No.# 2/2
2. The Petitioner herein has assailed the Award dated 02.04.2018 passed by the learned Labour Court, Guwahati in Reference Case No.5/2006.
3. The record reveals that in pursuance to an order passed by this Court on 28.08.2025, the instant proceedings was referred to mediation. In pursuance thereto, it has been brought to the attention of this Court vide the report of the learned Mediator that the matter between the Petitioner as well as the Respondents had been amicably settled and an agreement had been entered into on 27.03.2026.
4. Taking into account that the said agreement has been arrived at without any fraud or coercion, the said agreement is duly accepted.
5. This Court further observes and directs that the terms of the agreement shall be a part of the instant order and the parties would be bound by the terms of the agreement.
6. With the above, the instant proceedings stands disposed of.
7. Return the record(s).
JUDGE Comparing Assistant