Gauhati High Court
AB/516/2026 of AMAR GUPTA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 4 May 2026
GAHC010040482026 2026:GAU-AS:6123 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/516/2026 AMAR GUPTA S/O ASHOK GUPTA R/O MATIGARA P.O. AND P.S. MATIGARA DIST. DARJEELING, WEST BENGAL, PIN CODE-734010 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010040482026
2026:GAU-AS:6123
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/516/2026
AMAR GUPTA
S/O ASHOK GUPTA
R/O MATIGARA
P.O. AND P.S. MATIGARA
DIST. DARJEELING, WEST BENGAL, PIN CODE-734010
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : J U AHMED, MR. N K MURRY,MR. R K MUSHAHARY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 05-05-2026 Heard Mr. J.U. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing in the matter. The Case Diary has been produced.
Page No.# 2/2 The Case Diary reveals that along with suspicion of carrying illegal cattle in pathetic, overcrowded condition with no provision for food, water or adequate space etc., allegations are also there, that fake documents like permit to transport the cattle and fake purchase receipts etc. had been seized from the persons arrested, who were accompanying the cattle. The petitioner appears to be the driver of the vehicle, who had evaded arrest during the road traffic accident. On perusal of the Case Diary, this Court is of the opinion that the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner at this stage cannot be considered. Accordingly, the same is rejected at this stage.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant