Gauhati High Court

WA/131/2026 of RAHUL ROY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. on 3 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010084712026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/131/2026 RAHUL ROY S/O SRI GAUTAM RAY, CANDIDATE, LAC-121, HAILAKANDI, R/O ROYS VILLA, UKILPATTY, SILCHAR, P.O.- SILCHAR, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788001 VERSUS 1. THE

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010084712026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WA/131/2026

RAHUL ROY

S/O SRI GAUTAM RAY, CANDIDATE, LAC-121, HAILAKANDI, R/O ROYS

VILLA, UKILPATTY, SILCHAR, P.O.- SILCHAR, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788001

VERSUS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA HEADED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI-110001 3:THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER ASSAM JANATA BHAWAN BLOCK-C 4TH FLOOR DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 4:THE DISTRICT ELECTORAL OFFICER HAILAKANDI DISTRICT HAILAKANDI 5:THE RETURNING OFFICER LAC-121 HAILAKANDI CONSTITUENCY ASSAM 6:THE GENERAL OBSERVER HAILAKANDI ELECTION DISTRICT HAILAKANDI 7:THE GENERAL OBSERVER ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI- 110001 8:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE KATLICHERRA POLICE STATION HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-78816

Page No.# 2/2 For the Appellant(s) : Ms. S.B. Choudhury, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. S. Katakey, Standing Counsel, ECI. : Ms. S. Sarma, Government Advocate, Assam. –B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

04.05.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ)

After some arguments, Ms. S.B. Choudhury, learned Advocate for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this writ appeal as it has become infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous.

JUDGE CHIEF

JUSTICE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead